The types of skewness is studied in relation to the shape of the frequency curve of the frequency distribution of data.
What is Skewness and types of skewness in Statistics?
As we know every frequency distribution needs to be symmetrical or symmetrically distributed, but there are a lot of factors that affect the data, classification, and interpretation of variables.
The symmetrical frequency distribution is represented in the bell-shaped graph below:
Meaning of Skewness
Meaning of Frequency Distribution
While doing the classification of data, values of variable under study are considered. This is known as classification of data or Frequency distribution.Types of Skewness
The skewness of frequency distribution can be of two types:(1) Positive Skewness
(2) Negative skewness
1. Positive Skewness or Positively Skewed Distribution
The frequency curve of the positively skewed frequency distribution is as shown in the above diagram-A frequency distribution in which the values of the mean, median, and mode are in descending order i.e. x̄ > M > Z, is said to be a positively skewed frequency distribution.
In frequency distribution with positive skewness, the distance between the third quartile and the median is greater than the distance between the median and the first quartile. i.e. Q3 - M > M - Q1
In such a frequency distribution, the right tail of its frequency curve is more elongated than the left tail.
2. Negative Skewness or Negatively Skewed Distribution
The frequency curve of the negatively skewed frequency distribution is as shown in the above diagram-A frequency distribution in which the values of the mean, median, and mode are in ascending order i.e. x̄ < M < Z, is said to be a negatively skewed frequency distribution.
In frequency distribution with Negative skewness, the distance between the third quartile and the median is less than the distance between the median and the first quartile.i.e. Q3 - M < M - Q1
In such a frequency distribution, the left tail of its frequency curve is more elongated than the right tail.
After learning the types of skewness lets also understand the “Tests of Skewness”
We know that the lack of symmetry of a frequency distribution is called skewness. To decide whether a given frequency distribution is skewed or not the following tests can be used.(1) A frequency distribution in which the values of the mean, median, and mode are not equal.
(2) If both the quartiles i.e. the first and third quartiles are equidistant from the median, then such a frequency distribution is said to be skewed.
(3) If the frequency curve of the frequency distribution is not bell-shaped then it is said to be skewed.
(4) Frequency distribution in which the frequencies of the classes which are located equidistant from the middle class are not equal is said to be skewed frequency distribution.
(5) If the right tail or the left tail of the frequency curve is more elongated then the frequency distribution is said to be skewed frequency distribution.
Skewness and co-efficient of skewness
Types of skewness with Examples.
Methods of determining Skewness and the coefficient of Skewness.
If a frequency curve of a given frequency
distribution is drawn, then it can be known whether the skewness is
positive or negative. But the numerical measure of skewness can not be known.
Also, it is necessary to find numerical measures of skewness for comparison of
two or more frequency distributions. For determining skewness and the
coefficient of skewness following two methods are used.
(I) Karl Pearson’s Method
(II) Bowley’s Method
(1) Karl Pearson’s Method:
Base: In a skewed frequency distribution, the
values of the mean, median, and mode are not equal i.e. X̅ not equal to M not equal to Z. Also, the median always lies between
the mean and mode. Karl Pearson’s method is based on this test of skewness.
Formulae: Skewness is the difference between the mean
and mode.
i.e. skewness (sk) = X̅ - Z
The coefficient of skewness is obtained by
dividing the above difference by standard deviation (S).
i.e. coefficient of Skewness (j) = X̅
- Z / S
When the frequency distribution is not unimodal
or otherwise the mode is ill-defined, then mode can be obtained by the formula Z
= -3M – 2X̅
Hence, when a mode is ill-defined then the following
formulae are used.
Skewness (sk) = 3 (X̅ - M)
Coefficient of Skewness (j) = 3 (X̅ - M)
/ S
Note:
(i) The value of the coefficient of skewness given by formula 3 ( X̅ - M) / S always lies between between -1.73 and +1.73 for any uni-modal skewed frequency distribution.
This
has been proved by statistician N.L. Johnson in the year
1951. But generally, in practice, the value of j based on a sample lies
between -1 and +1 for skewed frequency distribution.
(ii)
The value of the coefficient of skewness given by formula j = 3 ( X̅ - M) / S always lies between
-3 and +3.
(iii) The mode is said to be ill-defined in the
following situation:
(a) if the frequency distribution has classes
of unequal length.
(b) if the frequency distribution is a mixed
type (partly discrete and partly continuous).
(c) If the frequency distribution has been more
than one mode. In this situation, the following formulae are used.
sk = 3 (X̅ - M) and j = 3 (X̅ - M) / S
(2) Bowley’s Method :
Base: In a skewed frequency distribution, both the quartile Q1 and Q3 are not equi-distant from the median. i.e. Q3 – M not equal to M – Q1. Bowley’s method is based on this test of skewness.
Formulae: The difference between the distance Q3 – M and M – Q1 is taken as the absolute measure of skewness (sk).
i.e. Skewness (sk) = (Q3 – M) – (M – Q1)
= Q3 – M – M + Q1
Skewness (sk) = Q3 + Q1 – 2M
The coefficient of skewness is obtained by dividing the above difference by the sum of the distance Q3 – M and M – Q1.
coefficient of skewness (j) = Q3 + Q1 – 2M / Q3 - Q1
Note: the value of the coefficient of skewness (j) given by Bowley’s method always lies between -1 and +1.
Comparison of Karl Pearson's Method and Bowley's Method.
1. As Karl Pearson's method and
Bowley's method are based on different assumptions, the values of the
coefficient of skewness obtained by the two methods may not be equal.
2. The calculations are simple and easy in
Bowley's method, whereas the calculations are not simple in taking more time in
Karl Pearson's method.
3. The co-efficient of skewness obtained
by Karl Pearson's method is more reliable than Bowley's method. Karl
Pearson's formula off is based on mean X and standard deviation (S) which are the
best measures of average and dispersion.
4. Karl Pearson's method cannot be used for open-end frequency distribution. When open-end frequency distribution is given then Bowley's method is to be used.
Points to be
remembered while solving examples
(1) If it is not stated by which method co-efficient of skewness is to be calculated in the example, then use Karl Pearson's method.
(2) If the frequency distribution is open-end frequency distribution, then use Bowley's method for calculating the coefficient of skewness.
(3) In a given frequency distribution, the observations or the classes are to be arranged in ascending order if they are not in ascending order.
(4) If the classes of a given frequency distribution are exclusive, then find boundary points for the corresponding classes for calculating median, mode, or quartiles.
(5) If the cumulative frequency distribution of 'less than type' or 'more than type' is given, then convert it into an original frequency distribution.
(6) If instead of
classes, the mid-values are given then first find boundary points for
(7) If mode is ill-defined, then for Karl Pearson's method use the following formulae.
sk = 3 (X̅ - M) and j = 3 (X̅ - M) / S
(8) If a given
frequency distribution is of unequal class interval or of mixed type i.e.
partly discrete and partly continuous, then for calculation of mean and
standard1 deviation by short cut method class interval (C) should not be taken.
(9) The value of the coefficient of skewness may be positive, negative, or zero.
Kurtosis
Kurtosis refers to the degree of presence of outliers in the distribution.
Kurtosis is a statistical measure, whether the data is heavy-tailed or light-tailed in a normal distribution.
In finance, kurtosis is used as a measure of financial risk. A large kurtosis is associated with a high level of risk for an investment because it indicates that there are high probabilities of extremely large and extremely small returns.
On the other hand, a small kurtosis signals a moderate level of risk because the probabilities of extreme returns are relatively low.
Excess Kurtosis
The excess kurtosis is used in statistics and probability theory to compare the kurtosis coefficient with that normal distribution.
Excess kurtosis can be positive (Leptokurtic distribution), negative (Platykurtic distribution), or near to zero (Mesokurtic distribution). Since normal distributions have a kurtosis of 3, excess kurtosis is calculating by subtracting kurtosis by 3.
Excess kurtosis = Kurt – 3
Types of excess kurtosis
- Leptokurtic or heavy-tailed distribution (kurtosis more than normal distribution).
- Mesokurtic (kurtosis same as the normal distribution).
- Platykurtic or short-tailed distribution (kurtosis less than normal distribution).
Leptokurtic (kurtosis > 3)
Leptokurtic is having very long and skinny tails, which means there are more chances of outliers. Positive values of kurtosis indicate that distribution is peaked and possesses thick tails.
An extreme positive kurtosis indicates a distribution where more of the numbers are located in the tails of the distribution instead of around the mean.
platykurtic (kurtosis < 3)
Platykurtic having a lower tail and stretched around center tails means most of the data points are present in high proximity with mean.
A platykurtic distribution is flatter (less peaked) when compared with the normal distribution.
Mesokurtic (kurtosis = 3)
Mesokurtic is the same as the normal distribution, which means kurtosis is near to 0.
In Mesokurtic, distributions are moderate in breadth, and curves are a medium peaked height.
Summary
The skewness is a measure of symmetry or asymmetry of data distribution, and kurtosis measures whether data is heavy-tailed or light-tailed in a normal distribution.
Data can be positive-skewed (data-pushed towards the right side) or negative-skewed (data-pushed towards the left side).
When data skewed, the tail region may behave as an outlier for the statistical model, and outliers unsympathetically affect the model’s performance especially regression-based models.
Some statistical models are hardy to outliers like Tree-based models, but it will limit the possibility to try other models. So there is a necessity to transform the skewed data to close enough to a Normal distribution.
Excess kurtosis can be positive (Leptokurtic distribution), negative (Platykurtic distribution), or near to zero (Mesokurtic distribution).
Leptokurtic distribution (kurtosis more than normal distribution). Mesokurtic distribution (kurtosis same as the normal distribution). Platykurtic distribution (kurtosis less than normal distribution).
Post A Comment:
0 comments so far,add yours
Please do not add any spam link in the comment box